The True Cost of Hiring: Agency Fees vs. In-House vs. Embedded Recruiting (January 2026)

Dover

February 3, 2026

3 mins

Your hiring budget is likely one of the largest line items you’ll manage this year, but the true cost of hiring changes dramatically depending on how you bring people on. Agency fees, full-time recruiters, and embedded or fractional models all carry very different price tags once you account for volume, time, and risk. This guide breaks down how each hiring model actually works, what you’ll pay per hire at different stages, and why the cheapest option on paper often isn’t the lowest-cost choice in practice.

TLDR:

  • Agency fees typically cost 20-30% of salary ($24K-$36K for a $120K hire) vs embedded recruiting at $2K-$7K per hire.

  • In-house recruiters break even around 6-8 hires annually but cost $24K per hire at lower volumes.

  • Hidden costs like failed hires and open role revenue loss can multiply your recruiting spend by 5x.

  • Cost per hire only makes sense in context; volume and predictability determine which model is actually cheapest.

  • Some modern fractional recruiting solutions can deliver meaningful cost savings versus agencies, with no contracts or long-term commitments.

Your hiring budget is likely one of the largest line items you’ll manage this year, but the true cost of hiring changes dramatically depending on how you bring people on. Agency fees, full-time recruiters, and embedded or fractional models all carry very different price tags once you account for volume, time, and risk. This guide breaks down how each hiring model actually works, what you’ll pay per hire at different stages, and why the cheapest option on paper often isn’t the lowest-cost choice in practice.

TLDR:

  • Agency fees typically cost 20-30% of salary ($24K-$36K for a $120K hire) vs embedded recruiting at $2K-$7K per hire.

  • In-house recruiters break even around 6-8 hires annually but cost $24K per hire at lower volumes.

  • Hidden costs like failed hires and open role revenue loss can multiply your recruiting spend by 5x.

  • Cost per hire only makes sense in context; volume and predictability determine which model is actually cheapest.

  • Some modern fractional recruiting solutions can deliver meaningful cost savings versus agencies, with no contracts or long-term commitments.

Understanding the True Cost Per Hire in 2026

Understanding the True Cost Per Hire in 2026

Cost per hire breaks down to a simple calculation: total recruiting spend divided by number of hires. The most widely cited benchmark puts average cost per hire around $4,700, according to the Society for Human Resource Management.



But this number changes dramatically based on your hiring model and which expenses you're actually tracking. Internal costs like recruiter salaries, interview time, and software stack up differently than external costs such as agency fees, job board postings, and background checks.

For early-stage companies, this isn't background noise. For small teams, cost per hire consistently ranks among the most closely tracked HR metrics, especially for companies under 50 employees where each hire materially impacts runway. When runway is tight, understanding where each recruiting dollar goes becomes critical to scaling your team without burning cash.


What Traditional Recruiting Agency Fees Actually Cost

What Traditional Recruiting Agency Fees Actually Cost

Recruitment agencies charge 20-30% of first-year salary as a contingency fee, payable when your candidate accepts the offer.

For a $120,000 engineering hire, expect $24,000 to $36,000 in agency fees. A $90,000 product manager costs $18,000 to $27,000. An executive at $200,000 runs $40,000 to $60,000.

The percentage varies by role complexity and negotiating power. Standard corporate roles often land around 20%, while specialized tech positions or executive searches push toward 25-30%. First-time clients typically pay more than companies with existing agency relationships.

Many agencies offer a replacement or refund guarantee window, but you still lose time and opportunity cost if the hire fails. If you hire multiple people for the same role within the guarantee period, you'll owe fees on subsequent hires.

The Complete Cost of In-House Recruiting

The Complete Cost of In-House Recruiting

In-house recruiting costs can land in the low double-digits as a percentage of salary once you account for recruiter compensation, benefits, and recruiting tools. A full-time tech recruiter runs $80,000-$120,000 annually in base salary, with another $20,000-$30,000 for health insurance, payroll taxes, ATS subscriptions, LinkedIn Recruiter licenses, sourcing tools, and office overhead.

The per-hire math works cleanly at scale. If your recruiter closes 10 hires per year at an average salary of $100,000, you're spending roughly $12,000 per hire after dividing total cost by placements. But volume swings change the equation quickly. Drop to five hires and your per-hire cost doubles to $24,000.

You're also betting on finding a recruiter who can hire across multiple functions. An engineering recruiter may struggle to fill your first sales or marketing roles, forcing you to pay agency fees anyway.

Embedded Recruiting Costs and How the Model Works

Embedded recruiting brings in an external recruiter who works alongside your team on an hourly or monthly subscription basis. These recruiters use your ATS, attend your standups, and source candidates under your company's brand. You pay only for hours worked and can scale up or down as hiring needs change.

Pricing Structure

Most embedded recruiters charge $100-$250 per hour depending on experience level and role complexity. A typical month of support runs 40-80 hours, translating to $4,000-$20,000 per month.

Dover's fractional recruiters follow this model. Companies pay an hourly rate with no long-term contracts, and most spend $2,000-$7,000 per hire. This typically delivers substantial savings compared to traditional agency fees. On that $120,000 engineering role, you'd spend around $4,500 instead of $30,000.

Hidden Costs That Double Your True Hiring Expenses

Internal time adds up quickly. A five-person interview loop spending four hours each can easily cost over $1,000 in fully loaded labor, repeated for every finalist. Multiply that across hiring manager prep, panel coordination, and debriefs.



Failed hires compound the damage. Replacing someone within their first year means paying recruiting costs twice, plus severance and lost productivity. Bad hires cost roughly five times their annual salary when you include training waste and team impact.

Open roles drain revenue. For a $150,000 sales hire expected to generate $1M annually, each month of vacancy can represent roughly $80K+ in delayed potential revenue, before you account for ramp time and attainment variability. Engineering roles delay product launches. Every week a critical position stays empty means overworked teams and missed deadlines.

Startup Hiring Benchmarks: What You Should Actually Be Spending

Many early-stage startups aim to keep non-technical hiring in the $3,000-$5,000 per-hire range. Technical hiring costs jump to $10,000-$20,000 per engineer due to specialized sourcing requirements and extended interview processes. Executive placements start at $28,000 and climb based on seniority.

Tracking cost per hire matters more than hitting exact benchmarks. If you're spending $15,000 on a mid-level role that similar companies fill for $5,000, you're either overpaying for recruiting services or burning internal time on coordination.

Stage affects targets. Pre-seed companies hiring their first five employees should stay closer to $2,000-$3,000 per hire. Series A teams can support $5,000-$7,000, while Series B companies typically spend $8,000-$12,000 as quality bars rise.

When Each Hiring Model Makes the Most Financial Sense

The decision comes down to annual hiring volume and predictability, not upfront cost.

Hiring 1-2 people per year makes agencies or fractional recruiters the right choice. An occasional $4,000-$7,000 spend beats paying a full-time salary for underutilized capacity.

The 3-6 hire range fits embedded or fractional models. You need consistent recruiting support without enough volume to support overhead. Monthly engagement with the same recruiter builds institutional knowledge without the commitment.

Six or more hires annually tips the math toward in-house. At this volume, a dedicated recruiter's fixed cost drops below $15,000 per hire while giving you full control over candidate experience and employer branding.

Unpredictable hiring needs favor flexible models. If you're closing three roles this quarter but none next quarter, pay-as-you-go fractional recruiting beats carrying fixed headcount.

The decision comes down to annual hiring volume and predictability, not upfront cost.

Hiring 1-2 people per year makes agencies or fractional recruiters the right choice. An occasional $4,000-$7,000 spend beats paying a full-time salary for underutilized capacity.

The 3-6 hire range fits embedded or fractional models. You need consistent recruiting support without enough volume to support overhead. Monthly engagement with the same recruiter builds institutional knowledge without the commitment.

Six or more hires annually tips the math toward in-house. At this volume, a dedicated recruiter's fixed cost drops below $15,000 per hire while giving you full control over candidate experience and employer branding.

Unpredictable hiring needs favor flexible models. If you're closing three roles this quarter but none next quarter, pay-as-you-go fractional recruiting beats carrying fixed headcount.

The decision comes down to annual hiring volume and predictability, not upfront cost.

Hiring 1-2 people per year makes agencies or fractional recruiters the right choice. An occasional $4,000-$7,000 spend beats paying a full-time salary for underutilized capacity.

The 3-6 hire range fits embedded or fractional models. You need consistent recruiting support without enough volume to support overhead. Monthly engagement with the same recruiter builds institutional knowledge without the commitment.

Six or more hires annually tips the math toward in-house. At this volume, a dedicated recruiter's fixed cost drops below $15,000 per hire while giving you full control over candidate experience and employer branding.

Unpredictable hiring needs favor flexible models. If you're closing three roles this quarter but none next quarter, pay-as-you-go fractional recruiting beats carrying fixed headcount.

How Dover's Fractional Recruiting Delivers Agency Quality at Embedded Pricing


We connect startups with experienced recruiters who work hourly inside your hiring process. These fractional recruiters handle sourcing, screening, and closing candidates like an in-house team member, but you pay only for hours used.

Companies often spend $2,000-$7,000 per hire through our marketplace versus $18,000-$36,000 through traditional agencies. The model removes percentage-based fees while maintaining recruiter quality. We maintain a highly selective network of experienced recruiters with deep startup hiring backgrounds, so you work with recruiters who have 10-15 years of startup experience.

You start with an $800 refundable deposit and no contract. Scale up when you're actively hiring, pause when you're not. Choose which recruiters match your needs instead of getting assigned whoever's available.


We connect startups with experienced recruiters who work hourly inside your hiring process. These fractional recruiters handle sourcing, screening, and closing candidates like an in-house team member, but you pay only for hours used.

Companies often spend $2,000-$7,000 per hire through our marketplace versus $18,000-$36,000 through traditional agencies. The model removes percentage-based fees while maintaining recruiter quality. We maintain a highly selective network of experienced recruiters with deep startup hiring backgrounds, so you work with recruiters who have 10-15 years of startup experience.

You start with an $800 refundable deposit and no contract. Scale up when you're actively hiring, pause when you're not. Choose which recruiters match your needs instead of getting assigned whoever's available.


We connect startups with experienced recruiters who work hourly inside your hiring process. These fractional recruiters handle sourcing, screening, and closing candidates like an in-house team member, but you pay only for hours used.

Companies often spend $2,000-$7,000 per hire through our marketplace versus $18,000-$36,000 through traditional agencies. The model removes percentage-based fees while maintaining recruiter quality. We maintain a highly selective network of experienced recruiters with deep startup hiring backgrounds, so you work with recruiters who have 10-15 years of startup experience.

You start with an $800 refundable deposit and no contract. Scale up when you're actively hiring, pause when you're not. Choose which recruiters match your needs instead of getting assigned whoever's available.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much should a startup expect to spend per hire in 2026?

Early-stage startups typically spend $3,000-$5,000 per hire for non-technical roles and $10,000-$20,000 for engineering positions. Your actual costs depend on hiring volume and whether you use agencies (20-30% of salary), in-house recruiters (12% of salary at scale), or fractional recruiters ($2,000-$7,000 per hire).

When does hiring a full-time recruiter make more sense than using fractional help?

A full-time recruiter becomes cost-effective around 6-8 hires per year. Below that threshold, you're paying for unused capacity; fractional recruiters let you pay only for hours worked and scale up or down as hiring needs change without carrying fixed overhead.

What's the real difference between agency fees and embedded recruiting costs?

Agencies charge 20-30% of first-year salary (typically $24,000-$36,000 for a $120,000 hire), while embedded recruiters work hourly and cost $2,000-$7,000 per hire on average. Embedded recruiters work inside your team using your ATS and brand, while agencies operate externally and often work with multiple clients simultaneously.

Can I pause fractional recruiting services between hiring pushes?

Yes, fractional recruiting works on a pay-as-you-go model with no long-term contracts. You can ramp up support when actively hiring multiple roles and pause completely during slow periods, paying only for hours actually worked instead of carrying fixed monthly costs.

How much should a startup expect to spend per hire in 2026?

Early-stage startups typically spend $3,000-$5,000 per hire for non-technical roles and $10,000-$20,000 for engineering positions. Your actual costs depend on hiring volume and whether you use agencies (20-30% of salary), in-house recruiters (12% of salary at scale), or fractional recruiters ($2,000-$7,000 per hire).

When does hiring a full-time recruiter make more sense than using fractional help?

A full-time recruiter becomes cost-effective around 6-8 hires per year. Below that threshold, you're paying for unused capacity; fractional recruiters let you pay only for hours worked and scale up or down as hiring needs change without carrying fixed overhead.

What's the real difference between agency fees and embedded recruiting costs?

Agencies charge 20-30% of first-year salary (typically $24,000-$36,000 for a $120,000 hire), while embedded recruiters work hourly and cost $2,000-$7,000 per hire on average. Embedded recruiters work inside your team using your ATS and brand, while agencies operate externally and often work with multiple clients simultaneously.

Can I pause fractional recruiting services between hiring pushes?

Yes, fractional recruiting works on a pay-as-you-go model with no long-term contracts. You can ramp up support when actively hiring multiple roles and pause completely during slow periods, paying only for hours actually worked instead of carrying fixed monthly costs.

How much should a startup expect to spend per hire in 2026?

Early-stage startups typically spend $3,000-$5,000 per hire for non-technical roles and $10,000-$20,000 for engineering positions. Your actual costs depend on hiring volume and whether you use agencies (20-30% of salary), in-house recruiters (12% of salary at scale), or fractional recruiters ($2,000-$7,000 per hire).

When does hiring a full-time recruiter make more sense than using fractional help?

A full-time recruiter becomes cost-effective around 6-8 hires per year. Below that threshold, you're paying for unused capacity; fractional recruiters let you pay only for hours worked and scale up or down as hiring needs change without carrying fixed overhead.

What's the real difference between agency fees and embedded recruiting costs?

Agencies charge 20-30% of first-year salary (typically $24,000-$36,000 for a $120,000 hire), while embedded recruiters work hourly and cost $2,000-$7,000 per hire on average. Embedded recruiters work inside your team using your ATS and brand, while agencies operate externally and often work with multiple clients simultaneously.

Can I pause fractional recruiting services between hiring pushes?

Yes, fractional recruiting works on a pay-as-you-go model with no long-term contracts. You can ramp up support when actively hiring multiple roles and pause completely during slow periods, paying only for hours actually worked instead of carrying fixed monthly costs.

Final Thoughts on Reducing Your Cost Per Hire

Getting hiring economics right isn’t about chasing industry averages; it’s about understanding the true cost of hiring as your team grows. When you factor in volume, speed, and the risk of mis-hires, the cheapest option on paper often isn’t the one that saves the most money. Fractional recruiting offers a way to control spend without delaying hires or carrying fixed overhead, giving founders flexibility as plans change. Dover supports this approach by letting teams work with experienced recruiters on their own timeline, paying only for the hours used while keeping costs aligned with actual hiring needs.

Getting hiring economics right isn’t about chasing industry averages; it’s about understanding the true cost of hiring as your team grows. When you factor in volume, speed, and the risk of mis-hires, the cheapest option on paper often isn’t the one that saves the most money. Fractional recruiting offers a way to control spend without delaying hires or carrying fixed overhead, giving founders flexibility as plans change. Dover supports this approach by letting teams work with experienced recruiters on their own timeline, paying only for the hours used while keeping costs aligned with actual hiring needs.

Getting hiring economics right isn’t about chasing industry averages; it’s about understanding the true cost of hiring as your team grows. When you factor in volume, speed, and the risk of mis-hires, the cheapest option on paper often isn’t the one that saves the most money. Fractional recruiting offers a way to control spend without delaying hires or carrying fixed overhead, giving founders flexibility as plans change. Dover supports this approach by letting teams work with experienced recruiters on their own timeline, paying only for the hours used while keeping costs aligned with actual hiring needs.

Table of contents

Kickstart recruiting with Dover's Recruiting Partners
Kickstart recruiting with Dover's Recruiting Partners
Kickstart recruiting with Dover's Recruiting Partners